Skip to content

Application health check Evidence, not opinions. A letter grade for any application.

A disciplined, read-only assessment of any codebase, graded across twelve verticals and handed back as a report card you can act on or take to a board.

  • Read-only, nothing in your code changes
  • Twelve verticals graded
  • Security, data, and compliance weighted double
  • In business since 2012

One report card for the whole application.

We map the app before we judge it, then grade every layer that matters, from architecture and security to data, resilience, and compliance. You get one clear picture and a plan, not a tool dump.

  • A full application profile

    Before any grade, we map the stack, the entry points, the data, and the risk surfaces from the code itself, so every judgment rests on what is actually there.

  • A graded report card

    Twelve verticals, each with a clear letter grade and the single risk that matters most. Architecture, security, data, performance, resilience, compliance, and more.

  • Findings that carry evidence

    Every finding points to a line of code, a command with its output, or a config value. Anything we cannot prove is dropped, not softened.

  • A costed fix list

    Every issue is sized and prioritized, so you know what to fix first, what it takes, and which work protects revenue or closes real risk.

  • A grade you can trust

    One exploitable hole caps the whole grade, no matter how strong the rest. A team cannot average past the one thing that would get them breached.

  • Read-only, start to finish

    We assess, we do not touch. Diagnosis and repair are separate engagements, which keeps the evidence clean and the grade honest.

Nothing graded on vibes, nothing skipped in silence.

Every vertical is assessed, or explicitly marked not applicable with a reason. These are the twelve.

  • Architecture

    Boundaries, layering, and whether dependencies point one way.

  • Code quality

    Readable, cohesive code with the linter actually enforced.

  • Security

    Authentication, authorization, injection, and secrets. Weighted double.

  • Data and migrations

    Reversible schema changes, real constraints, and a tested restore.

  • Performance

    Indexed hot paths, bounded queries, and no N+1 surprises.

  • Resilience

    Timeouts, retries, idempotency, and graceful failure.

  • Observability

    Honest health checks, real alerting, and traceable logs.

  • Supply chain

    Locked dependencies, scanned for known vulnerabilities.

  • Testing and CI

    Core flows covered and the gates that actually block a merge.

  • Frontend and UX

    Accessible, resilient interfaces with every state designed.

  • Docs and runbooks

    A README that works and runbooks for the bad day.

  • Compliance and privacy

    PII mapped, retention enforced, obligations met. Weighted double.

Grade it, fix what matters, keep it healthy.

A clear path from a first read to a system that stays healthy, with no surprises and nothing you did not ask for.

  1. 01

    Report card

    A fixed-scope diagnostic. The full profile, the twelve-vertical grade, and a costed fix list. Nothing in your code changes.

  2. 02

    Remediation sprint

    We fix the items you choose, in the order you choose, built to standard and closed with a production ship gate.

  3. 03

    Managed standard

    Quarterly re-grades trended over time, a gate on every release, and drift caught before it costs you.

Who it is for

Every engagement is scoped to the app in front of us.

  • Leaders who need a grade they can act on or take to a board
  • Buyers who need evidence, not opinions, before they trust an application
  • Teams that want a costed fix list before they commit to remediation
  • Owners who want the code graded without anyone changing it

The same bar we hold our own products to.

We run this assessment against our own security products at a higher bar than we hold anyone else to, so the method is proven where the stakes are highest, not just described on a slide.

  • Evidence over opinion

    Line numbers and command output, not adjectives. What we cannot prove does not ship in the report.

  • Diagnosis, then treatment

    The grade comes first and comes clean. Fixing what it finds is a separate, scoped engagement you choose to take.

Application health check questions

Short answers first. Ask Zeus or the team for the rest.

What is the application health check?

A disciplined, read-only assessment of any codebase, graded across twelve verticals. You get a report card with a letter grade per vertical, findings that carry evidence, and a costed fix list.

Does Z7 change our code during the assessment?

No. We assess, we do not touch. Diagnosis and repair are separate engagements, which keeps the evidence clean and the grade honest.

Can a strong average hide a critical flaw?

No. Security, data, and compliance count double, and a single unresolved critical issue caps the whole score, no matter how strong everything else is. That is the part buyers trust.

What counts as evidence?

A line of code, a command with its output, or a config value. Anything we cannot prove is dropped, not softened.

What happens after the report card?

You choose. A remediation sprint fixes the items you pick, and because software drifts, we can re-grade on a cadence and catch decay before it compounds.

Point it at your application.

Book a call and we will walk you through the assessment and exactly what it covers.

Ask Zeus AI assistant